trejrco@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > Masataka - yes, you have voiced your e2e arguments - thank you for > your work. Thank you for your acknowledgment that you can't voice against my work. > We obviously disagree here, on a fundamental basis. I (and many > others) disagree that IPv6 'has failed' and are in fact > aggressively deploying it *right now* It has been so for more than these 10 years. So, maybe, within next 100 years, IPv6 maybe fully deployed. > WRT aggregation, PI space excepted, there is an IPv6 advantage > - the allocations are large enough (the more bits part) You obviously don't understand the fundamental problem against route aggregation, which is multi-homing, against which large allocation size is of no help. > Yes, GOSIP was a now-laughable effort ... Thank you again for let us remember the true meaning of governmental support. But, IPv6 has been laughed at for more than 10 years. Masataka Ohta _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf