David Morris allegedly wrote on 09/24/2009 5:34 PM: > > There has been much discussion of what the folks at the meeting might or > might not do which might result in some official action to terminate the > meeting early. I tend to side with the folks who believe it would take a > really egregious action to actually activate the clause because I'm > personally aware of how much non-conformance to official rules is > tolerated when officials perceive it in China's interest AND when it > isn't flaunted. > > That aside though, I've not seen a description of the part of the > contract provisions and/or venue plans which deal with the 'great > firewall' potential impact on the many ways IETF participants expect to > use the Internet during meetings. Both from a perspective of attendees > as well as those of us unlikely to be present but desiring traditional > audio, video, chat, etc. real time access. My experience has been that the "great firewall" was barely noticeable. I couldn't get to BBC at least once, but I could use IPsec or SSH, and Skype or SIP whenever I wanted to. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf