Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meetingof the IETF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Olafur Gudmundsson allegedly wrote on 09/24/2009 10:57 AM:
> At 23:45 23/09/2009, Cullen Jennings wrote:
> 
>> IAOC,
>>
>> I'm trying to understand what is political speech in China. The
>> Geopriv WG deals with protecting users' location privacy. The policies
>> of more than one country have come up in geopriv meetings in very
>> derogatory terms. There have been very derogatory comments made by
>> people about the US's wiretap policy. Unless someone can point me at
>> specifics of what is or is not OK, I would find this very concerning.
> 
> 
> Anything we think is a speculation, the ways of governments and
> hotels have their own logic that may not make sense to technical people.
> 
> As for restrictions on topics that border technical and political sphere,
> there are different restrictions in different countries.
> 
> I propose an experiment, lets have a meeting if it gets shut down
> we will never return to China.

Sounds good.

Cullen, you are looking for clear boundaries, but you're not going to
get them.  As in many countries, what is tolerated depends on time,
place, the particular people involved (on both sides), the weather, and
external factors such as whether there was an accidental gaffe from
Obama the day before.  The best thing to do is to depend on guidance
from the people who know the subtleties of the situation best.
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]