Jari, Aaron asked me to forward a comment I made on the IRSG list: The text below seems to almost encourage the IESG to do an IETF last call in the event of a dispute with the IRSG as to the content of an IESG note. That LC should be limited to the content of the IESG note I guess, and not to determine if the IETF have consensus on the document as a whole. If that's a reasonable interpretation I'd suggest changing as follows: OLD: The dialogue should not take more than six weeks. This period of time allows the IESG to conduct an IETF Last Call to determine community consensus if desired. NEW: The dialogue should not take more than six weeks. This period of time allows the IESG to conduct an IETF Last Call on the content of the proposed IESG note (and not on the document as a whole) to determine community consensus if desired. Regards, Stephen. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf