Re: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis and the optional/mandatory nature of IESG notes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:19:05AM -0700, Dave CROCKER wrote:
>> First, you lack empirical data to substantiate your assessment of the perception.
> 
> Well, Wikipedia (which IMO is primarily useful as a repository for
> finding out what "everyone knows") has this first sentence in its
> description of the RFC series:

It's certainly *not* what everybody knows; it's more like what
everybody's being told.

If you don't like a Wikipedia definition, change it. ;-)

Joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)

iEYEARECAAYFAkqqbTMACgkQE5f5cImnZruATgCePexWhxGHNJR2ygAU1iig4Smk
EaQAn110fNjgej7dQhiF+XKxXvmOY7w0
=4tjN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]