Brian E Carpenter wrote: > You say: "scope of the document is seemingly wrong." > > Well, the scope of the document is to discuss how actual networks > running IPv4 and IPv6 can deal with renumbering. So, it's a wrong scope. > That can't be "wrong"; It can be wrong. The reality, instead, is that actual networks running IPv4 and IPv6 ***CAN'T*** deal with renumbering, because of their inertia. > it is simply what we chose to write about. I'm saying that is a poor selection only to produce poor documents. If you don't mind, feel free to produce the poor documents. > If you'd like to start a thread about IPng, can you use a different > subject header please? I'm afraid, considering the so poor quality of IPv6, IETF has already lost power to produce IPngs. Masataka Ohta _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf