Hi Jari,
At 06:29 31-08-2009, Jari Arkko wrote:
And now back to the input that I wanted to hear. I would like to get
a sense from the list whether you prefer (a) that any exceptional
IESG note is just a recommendation to the RFC Editor or (b)
something that is always applied to the published RFC. Please reply
before the next IESG meeting on September 10. Some e-mails on this
topic have already been sent in the Last Call thread -- I have seen
those and there is no need to resend.
I prefer option (a); the IESG note is just a recommendation to the RFC Editor.
If the IESG wants the IESG Note to always be applied, it is
determining the RFC Editor policy and that's the role of the IAB
according to Section 5.
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf