On Jun 2, 2009, at 8:03 , Olaf Kolkman wrote:
RFC4846 section 5 uses the word "recommend" If the IESG, after completing its review, identifies issues, it may recommend explanatory or qualifying text for the RFC Editor to include in the document if it is published.
Olaf, I believe this means in the contents of the document. I am under the understanding the the IESG Note in RFC is provided by the IESG not by the RFC Editor. Is there a document that says otherwise? (I'm certainly open to the possibility that perhaps these documents should not have an IESG note but that seems a different issue)
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf