Joel M. Halpern wrote:
The documented rules
and practice has long been that with regard to Independent Submissions
the IESG notes are a request / recommendation to the RFC Editor (soon to
be ISE), not a statement of what will be included in the result.
...
Based on having seen a number of IESG notes, and reading the resulting
text and its inherent tone, I would strongly prefer that IESG notes be
an exception.
...
Thus, I strongly prefer (a). I prefer that such notes be rare, and
that they remain recommendations to the ISE.
+1.
It might help folks to understand the independent relationship, between the
IETF/IESG and these other RFC streams, if the title of this draft were changed
from "Handling of" to "Assisting with".
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf