Re: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis and the optional/mandatory nature of IESG notes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Joel M. Halpern wrote:
The documented rules and practice has long been that with regard to Independent Submissions the IESG notes are a request / recommendation to the RFC Editor (soon to be ISE), not a statement of what will be included in the result.
...
Based on having seen a number of IESG notes, and reading the resulting text and its inherent tone, I would strongly prefer that IESG notes be an exception.
...

Thus, I strongly prefer (a). I prefer that such notes be rare, and that they remain recommendations to the ISE.


+1.

It might help folks to understand the independent relationship, between the IETF/IESG and these other RFC streams, if the title of this draft were changed from "Handling of" to "Assisting with".

d/

--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]