Re: meta-issues on charter discussions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



+1

Thomas Narten wrote:
Jari,

I think you are on the right track. I have appreciated the notes you
send out with recharter messages explaining your thinking and the
purpose of the recharter.

But I do have an alternate proposal, if its important for the IETF community to understand the differences and rationales of charter changes better. Why don't we simply change the announcement format to include the three parts that I outlined above?

I'd strongly encourage the IESG to consider doing this for the formal
announcement. I think it would be a worthwhile improvement, and as you
say, the information should already be available. So it shouldn't
really be a lot of additional work.

Thomas
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]