On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 09:18:41AM -0400, John C Klensin wrote: > think Spencer and I were focused on a slightly earlier part of > the process, in which multiple drafts were circulating around in > the pre-BOF and immediate post-BOF stages. Those are drafts > that people closely involved with the group in formation need to > see and interact with (and that probably would benefit from > being a little more organized and easier to identify). The above suggests a way forward, then, involving nearly zero work on anyone's part. When a potential WG is in the nascent stages, someone who thought this a good idea could use the I-D approach as an experiment (probably requiring posting late versions to the target mailing list, due to the dark period before meetings; the sequential numbering would still hold). If people reported positive experience, then the strategy could be adapted. A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxx Shinkuro, Inc. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf