Re: meta-issues on charter discussions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 09:18:41AM -0400, John C Klensin wrote:

> think Spencer and I were focused on a slightly earlier part of
> the process, in which multiple drafts were circulating around in
> the pre-BOF and immediate post-BOF stages.  Those are drafts
> that people closely involved with the group in formation need to
> see and interact with (and that probably would benefit from
> being a little more organized and easier to identify).

The above suggests a way forward, then, involving nearly zero work on
anyone's part.  When a potential WG is in the nascent stages, someone
who thought this a good idea could use the I-D approach as an
experiment (probably requiring posting late versions to the target
mailing list, due to the dark period before meetings; the sequential
numbering would still hold).  If people reported positive experience,
then the strategy could be adapted.  

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Shinkuro, Inc.
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]