Andrew Sullivan wrote:
Why not have these "stable" licences published in RFCs? Those are already an archival format, so the reference is then not ambiguous. The code could then just include a [RFCnnnn] reference, I guess?
+1 d/-- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf