Re: Last Call: draft-nottingham-http-link-header (Web Linking) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mark Nottingham wrote:
...
* Is there a default encoding for parameter values, or in fact any other part of this header. I could not find anything in the draft which would indicate
   there is a default. Could this cause problems?

If they're a token (i.e., unquoted), they're restricted to ASCII in the BNF ( token = *CHAR = octets 0-127).

If it's a quoted-string, it's restricted to ISO-8859-1 unless encoded as per 2047 (like title*) (see RFC2616 section 2.2). However, HTTPbis looks
> ...

Almost. RFC 2047 does not work in parameter values, thus RFC 2231 encoding is needed...

...

BR, Julian
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]