On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:19:08AM +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> The *title parameter already allows for a language to be associated with
> the title. See RFC2231 and the examples in the link draft.
Of course, I should have spotted this.
I have two questions:
* Would it be harmful to mirror HTML and specify a redundant lang parameter
anyway, even though this can also be functionally acheived using RFC 2231
syntax. It may be easier for some people to understand this.
* Is there a default encoding for parameter values, or in fact any other part
of this header. I could not find anything in the draft which would indicate
there is a default. Could this cause problems?
Thanks,
--
Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf