At Wed, 22 Jul 2009 09:59:38 +0000, Florian Weimer wrote: > Anyway, those who object to the ECC infection should strive to remove > it from the base TLS spec. It doesn't make sense to rehash this > discussion over and over again, for each draft produced by the WG > which happens to be compatible with ECC algorithms and for which > Certicom files an IPR claim. Note: ECC isn't in the base spec, really. More precisely, the code points are defined in 4492. All the ECC that's defined in 5246 is the rules for what sorts of certificates may be used for a given algorithm, and that's because 5246 changed the rules beyond 4346 and so we wanted to have them all in one place. -Ekr _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf