Re: [IAB] [Trustees] Proposed Revisions to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions (TLP)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The proposed change to the boilerplate has not drawn a single negative comment, and there are a few documents in the RFC Editor queue that are waiting for this change. My preference would be for the Trust to approve the revised TLP that have not received any negative comments, and thus release the documents in the RFC Editor queue. Then, the Trust should put forward alternative text for the sections that have received negative comments, starting another review period.

Russ

At 06:49 PM 7/18/2009, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Hi,

I am baffled why this announcement, of fundamental importance,
was not sent to the correct list for IETF announcements.

The same applies to the original announcement, sent as I
understand it on 23 June, at a time when I wasn't reading
the discussion list for personal reasons.

I will comment substantively when I've had a chance to
read through the proposal and John's appeal. However, I
would suggest that the announcement should be sent
to the IETF announcement list, and that the one month
comment period should start again at that point.

   Brian

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]