Re: RFC archival format, was: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric Rosen wrote:
huge  number of  mobile devices  that  handle HTML  effortlessly and  IETF
legacy ASCII not at all

HTML is  a good presentation format, but  as an archival format  it seems to
leave a lot to be desired, as the included links always seem to go stale.
...

But that's a problem of the link targets, not the document format, right?

large number  of standard  office printers that  print HTML  instantly and
correctly

My experiences printing HTML docs are a bit different, I guess.

In generic, or HTML as produced by tools.ietf.org, xml2rfc, or rfc2629.xslt?

...

BR, Julian
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]