xml2rfc is OK ( was: Re: XML2RFC must die, was: Re: Two different threads - IETF Document Format)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 2009-7-5, at 16:24, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
My apologies for the subject line. I'm very disappointed that the
silent majority of draft authors isn't speaking up. I can't imagine
that the vast majority of draft authors has absolutely no problems
with XML2RFC. So I'm assuming they've been ignoring the thread,
hopefully the new subject line will get some of them to chime in.

since you asked: I have absolutely no problems with xml2rfc.

I used to edit in nroff, which wasn't compatible with my brain, and I used Joe's Word template, which works OK, but I prefer something ASCII- based for collaborative editing (for svn, diff, etc.)

I'm fully open to trying something new once someone creates a different ("better") tool, but until then, xml2rfc is OK.

Lars

<<attachment: smime.p7s>>

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]