I also would be against mandating xml2rfc. I do agree that certain aspects of xml2rfc are convenient, but when it comes to edit text, I really prefer .nroff On 09-07-05 8:16 PM, "ned+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ned+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I particularly like the fact that xml2rfc lets me focus on the content of my > drafts and spend very little time on presentation issues. I don't even want to > think about how much time I've wasted piddling around with formattting nits > when using nroff, and don't get me started on LaTeX. > > Oh, and as for installing the software, I'm not a TCL fan, but even so I've > done that on everything from Mac OS 9 to Solaris to OpenVMS. I sure can't say > the same for groff. I hope to have provided a simple way to get around these issues with nroff with the tool I wrote, as it makes it easy to do the formatting nits and does not require groff or any other external tools to be installed. /Stefan _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf