I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-pwe3-ms-pw-arch-06.txt Reviewer: Scott Brim Review Date: IETF LC End Date: 2009-06-16 IESG Telechat date: (if known) Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an informational RFC. Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: - In this one paragraph: Note that although Figure 4 only shows a single S-PE, a PW may transit more one S-PE along its path. This architecture is applicable when the S-PEs are statically chosen, or when they are chosen using a dynamic path selection mechanism. Both directions of an MS-PW must traverse the same set of S-PEs on a reciprocal path. Note that although the S-PE path is therefore reciprocal, the path taken by the PSN tunnels between the T-PEs and S-PEs may not be reciprocal due to choices made by the PSN routing protocol. ... "reciprocal" is used, but nowhere else in the document. Should it be "bi-directional" (used elsewhere)? - 15.1 "References" should be "Normative References" Scott _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf