Re: DNSSEC is NOT secure end to end

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ohta-san,

On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 21:32 +0900, Masataka Ohta wrote:
> I mention transport security merely because it is still required
> with DNSSEC, because administrative security of DNSSEC is
> cryptographically weak.

I think we all understand that it is possible to inject bad data into
the DNS at the parent.

What I do not understand about this comment is how transport security
can help in that case. Can you please explain?

Thanks,

--
Shane

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]