On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 08:10:55AM +0900, Masataka Ohta wrote: > In general, registries welcome DNSSEC, no matter how secure it is, > as long as its complicated operation works as an excuse to increase > (or not to reduce) registration charge and registries' revenue. That is a serious charge. I've seen no evidence that DNSSEC represents a revenue opportunity for registries. On the contrary, so far as I've seen, most registries are introducing it without any fee, even though it represents a substantial additional operational cost. (Indeed, some of us were at times under the impression that the practical inability to charge anything in order to offset this additional cost was one of the biggest barriers to DNSSEC deployment.) What registries are you thinking of that are charging extra for DNSSEC delegations (i.e. for accepting a DS record)? A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxx Shinkuro, Inc. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf