Hi, I got a comment regarding my statement below. I missed making it clear that this concerns what it possible to do using a single IP address on the client side, even if there are more possibilities if you have multiple ones. Magnus Westerlund skrev: > Hi, > > After having reviewed all the last call comments I like to make a > consensus call on this document. > > I think there is rough consensus for publication of this document given > that it is updated to make the following clear: > > - Make the applicability statement more clear on that any determination > is transient and may contain error requiring a user to have a fall back. > > - Make the proposed experiments clearer on how they can utilize the > mechanism. Especially the P2P needs to make clear why this could be > applicable given the limitations. > > - Make clear that the algorithms are proposals of what can be determined > using the STUN attributes and their behaviors using a single IP address on the client side. Additional determinations > are possible. > -- Magnus Westerlund IETF Transport Area Director & TSVWG Chair ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 Färögatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@xxxxxxxxxxxx ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf