Dean Willis wrote:
Consider that peering policy is often driven by things that are well beyond the scope of protocol. Its potential range of expression is unlimited; in fact driven by a natural-language contract and heuristic operations on underspecified constraints derived from that natural-language contract.
Good heavens - I was not proposing, nor would I propose, that what's needed here is the development of a policy language. If the word "policy" is making people uncomfortable perhaps it would be better to drop it in favor of "properties." Melinda _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf