Giyeong Son wrote: > I think that there are many working groups, standard bodies and > technologies who focuses on multiple addresses per host. So, I'd also > like MIF to concentrate on simultaneous connections to multiple networks > (or simultaneous use of multiple connections with multiple networks). I > believe that most of cases for simultaneous connections to multiple > networks require multiple addresses. However, it does not need to be the > main focus, but MIF NEEDS it. So, I would like to say that multiple > addresses per host needs to be addressed for simultaneous use of > multiple connections. Therefore, I think working on MIF problem should > be more than just focusing on multiple addresses. I think it's interesting that you appear to consider "multiple addresses per host" a narrower problem than "multiple network connections per host", whereas I consider the latter to be a subset of the former. I suppose that makes a good illustration of why I really want the WG to explore this issue from multiple points-of-view. Keith _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf