On Apr 17, 2009, at 9:32 AM, Samuel Weiler wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Cullen Jennings wrote: > I really don't understand why Dean should be blocked from > rai-ads@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Dean is the subject of a PR Action; Henrik needs no other reason to apply the blocking and, if there is a reason or triggering event (which seems likely), he needn't disclose it to Dean or to this list. In the general case, I also see no harm in the blocking: those aliases are for convenience, and it's easy to expand them using public sources. Blocking their use doesn't meaingfully hamper IETF participation. -- Sam
Sam, not disagreeing with anything you are saying here but none of this helps me understand why Dean should be blocked. [Note, I'm not saying this blocking is right or wrong, just that I don't understand why]. Should someone who is subject of a PR action just be automatically blocked from all IETF lists?
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf