Re: IETF NomCom Changes Discussion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, Russ,

I may have misunderstood (I was presenting, so not taking good notes during the NomCom discussions), but I'm looking at

   Russ asks who believes that we need to do anything that
   describes what is acceptable NomCom behaviour.

   many hums

   Russ asks who doesn't believe this is necessary?

   a few more hums

and remembering that this part of the conversation was about behavior beyond the NomCom (lobbying, etc) - behavior of nominees, behavior of people who have opinions about the people on the nominee list, etc.

This was certainly my understanding from Leslie's post on "openlist", on the NomCom mailing list.

Should I go listen to the audio?

Thanks,

Spencer

Several changes to the NomCom process were discussed during the plenary
session last Wednesday.  The minutes have been posted so that anyone that
was not at the plenary session can catch up.  The minutes can be found
here:

   http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/09mar/minutes/plenaryw.txt

The discussion will continue on the ietf-nomcom@xxxxxxxx mail list.

Thanks,
 Russ
_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]