Joe Abley wrote: > > On 23-Mar-2009, at 14:35, Melinda Shore wrote: > >> I was auto-subscribed to Dean's "ietf-honest" mailing >> list, and I'm unhappy about it. > > As I think was mentioned a day or two ago on this list, the reasonable > way I found to avoid these auto-subscriptions to ietf-honest was to > block packets from the originating network. I had a very enjoyable few > days following the installation of those packet filters. > > However, it now seems that (a) any address I've used in the past is now > fair game, and not just the addresses I'm using today, and (b) it's not > just the ietf list, but working group lists too, e.g. see below. I don't > have the same ability to do server-side filtering or packet blocking on > other mail accounts. Seems he wants the core of the Internet to apply those filters... I must say that I love the wording: >> This list was created by IADL.ORG (www.iadl.org) because of dishonest >> filtering by the IESG. See http://www.av8.net/IETF-watch for more >> information on the corrupt activities of officials of the Internet >> Society, Inc (ISOC) IETF Activity, and their connection to other >> corrupt activities. Those are clear allegations of corruption. Isn't that what the IETF calls an ad-hominum attack? Wasn't there something about that about causing subscriptions to be able to be blocked etc? >> You were probably added to this list because you participated in >> DNSOP@xxxxxxxx discussion, and that list is used to determine >> consensus for ISOC IETF Activity actions. Consensus is a democratic >> activity of the ISOC, which is a U.S. non-profit, tax exempt >> membership corporation. ALL members of the ISOC IETF have a property >> right to participate in its democratic decision processes. [see U.S. >> v. Local 560, extortion (Hobbs Act) and racketeering by mafia that >> took over a Union and tried to prevent participation by those opposing >> the mafia] Nice one, the IETF is compared to the Mafia. >> [..] IETF representatives (e.g. Working Group Chairs) have a duty >> to the corporation to read email sent to them on IETF business, and >> should not try to unsubscribe. And here it goes: as a WG chair you are not able to unsubscribe, you are not even allowed to try. Nice Mafia-alike practice. I didn't know that the IETF was incorporated btw. All news to me ;) Greets, Jeroen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf