RE: jim bound

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'll add my voice as another former DEC colleague who
was saddened by this news.

Jim never shied away from a challenging or contentious
job. For example, the work on enterprise networks in
RFCs 4852, 4057 could only have been done by someone
with Jim's fortitude.

I believe we are all better off for having known Jim,
and I will miss him.

Fred
fred.l.templin@xxxxxxxxxx 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Vixie [mailto:vixie@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 11:25 PM
> To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: jim bound
> 
> i shared the news with some coworkers from DEC (where jim and i both
worked
> back in the early 1990's).  one of them said:
> 
> > Wow, sorry to hear it.  Jim treated networking like he was still in
'Nam
> > and beauracracy was Charlie.  He always took the hill.
> 
> another added:
> 
> > I would only add that "he never left any behind."
> 
> jim will be missed, both sorely and otherwise, by me and by many
others.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]