Dear professionals and experts,
It's a proposal of global disussion about communication
protocols, for accelerating democratic activities including
discussing economic policy, election and voting.
A Digital Money System based upon numerical prosessor,
Operationg Systemand the TCP/IP networking has a critial
social security hole. I think. It might be a social security
issue considering extension or modification of fundamental
concept of computer networking.
My proposal comes from my academic research of A.I.
At first, I beleave in that a humanity can be understood as
a set of discrete signals and the mathematical
probability-transition flow. So, evn if democratic actiities
can be understood mathematically, also. So, it would be
possible to discuss about the method of realistic engineering
for accellrationg democratic activities, I beleave in.
The freedom of speech brings well understanding of each
humanities. Well understanding of each humanities could be
seeds of growth of culture. And the growth of culture
brings a growth of intelligence of a nation. That's why
the freedom of speech is tend to be admitted in modern
nations, I think.
World wide discusson of technical solutions for optimization
of democratic activities including discussing economic policy,
election or voting will promote new investment and deal
for new conceptual computer, prosessor/semiconductor or
the related electro-magnetic-optical networking.
Some kinds of conclusion through the global discussion can
reduce a risk of investment for new conceptual comunication
technologies.
I'm trying to write a Internet-Draft for such issues. I'm
looking for co-workers, co-reseachers and discussion area
for that task.
Any recommendation or advices? Sincerely.
Regards,
The present computer architecture was originally invented
as a numerical calculater. As you may know, the main circuit
of central pocesser unit is indeed an arithmetic calculater.
It was not created as an accelerator of interaction of
humanities. Of cource, many core processor is also.
As you may know, the CPU of computer is contorolled by
Operationg System. And the fundamental concept of
Operationg System was originally invented for both
abstraction of hardware and resource management.
It is originally invented by the programmer's point of view,
so, the role of Operationg System can be said as just
making programming efficiently. Generally, in Operationg
System, the power of controlling information is centrally
concentrated. Is it adespotism? Is there no need to
consider the separation of the power?
And also, the TCP/IP networking was originally designed
as a military network. It was invented for the objective
of efficient communication in troop or army, not for
optimization of democracy. There is no need to say,
grasping and controlling information among people is a
kind of power. In designing TCP/IP networking,
the meaning of separation of the power among citizen
was not considered. Should any modificationof TCP/IP
for democratic communication among people be needed?
In modern nations, why the power is separated? for
example, justice, legislation and administration.
What is the principle of separation of the power?
Does the scientific theorem of separation of the
power exist ? Who should have the power grasping
information among people?
Historically both Operating System and the TCP/IP
networking was not designed for optimization of democratic
activities, so, using Operating System and the TCP/IP
networking, the power of controling information will be
centrally concentrated, and putting democracy out
of balance.
Generally, we have two choices for understanding
a nation. One is that a nation is considered as a set of
organizations, and people always should belong to some
organization. And another is that a nation is considered
as a set of people or family, and organizations are just
methods for people not objectives of people. Reminding
and considering an idea of democratic egalitarianism,
the correct answer must be the later, a nation should
be considered as a set of people. Any organization
should be considered as just methods for people, not
objectives for people.
Using Operationg System and the TCP/IP networking as
bridges of communication of humanities, the power to
control information will be centrally gathered,and so,
the-companies-or -public-organizations-centric-
information-systems are tend to be constructed.
Because the power of controlling information is gathered
to excutives or managers of companies, and the excutives
or managers of campanies are easy to modify or hide
information of a part of public social system.
It would be difficult to check evil informatic activities
by excutives or managers of campanies. As I mentioned
above, a nation should be considered as a set of citizen,
not a set of military organization, the trend will put
democracy out of balance. Because democratic activities
depends upon intensive gathering of people's decision
making with correct balanced distribution of information.
Generally, in a democratic nation, each people is not only
a value judger but also a decision maker.
Most of all, in a digital money system based upon Operating
System and the TCP/IP networking, donation for political party
by excutives or managers of large campanies can't be publically
controlled. Because the current digital money system is based
upon OS and the TCP/IP networking, the power to contol
information is centrally gathered to excutives or managers.
The organization oriented information system bring putting
a national democracy out of balance.
Basically, for public infrastructure such as digital money
system, Operating System and the TCP/IP networking
is not suited to. We must modify the specifications of them
from the fundamental concept, I think. Should we choose
the central controlled information system in order to
construct a public digital money system ? Is it a correct
choice? We should remember the faces of the people
who was selling digital money system. We should remind
the faces of th people who was promoting numerical
computer network for social infrastructures. What ware
thay saying ? Was their thought sufficient? Was their
insight enough? Who was showing the academic direction
and the trend of informatics?
There is no need to say, high level decision making is
always going to affect the future rewards of people and
the satisfaction of nation. When we discuss the
communication technology for optimization of democratic
activities, we should truely be careful of the history and
the culture of each nations, and the deep insight will
be required. So, I propose a concept of Academic Criminals.
The concept is created for judging high level decision
making in academic opinions and activities. Generally,
academic opinions and activities can't be reviced by
current social system such as administration justice and
legislation. Because the present social systems are always
focusing the present problems, not focusing the far
future problems. Generally, an intellectual method of
prediction of the future should be included in academic
activities.
Historically, our civilization have been formed with
characters, languages, mathematics and any culture
based upon both paper and ink which have been used
for a long time. As you may know, these tools are
now going to be replaced with electro-maginetic-optical
devices. It means that renovation of civilization is
indeed under processing. The concept of Academic Criminals
will be useful for keeping general dicision making about
direction of academic activities and opinions in balance, I think.
Ultimate goal of these matters is finding out the theorem
for how to locate the power to control information among
the communication road of the people, where the power
to control information should be located, and how to
modify the location of the power to control information.
And, according to the theorem, the specifications of
Operationg System and the TCP/IP networking should be
modified. Generally, democratic systems can't be
constructed just by capitalism. It would be formed depending
upon an idea, ideology or scientific theorem, I beleave in.
And global discussion of solutions for optimization of democratic
activities can reduce a risk of investment for new conceptual
comunication technologies, and will promote new investment
and deal for new conceptual computer, prosessor/semiconductor
or the related electro-magnetic-optical networking.
Any recommendation or advices? Sincerely.
Regards,
---
TaddyHatty
taddyhatty at acm.org
taddyhatty at nifty.com
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf