Livingood, Jason wrote:
+1 - great idea.
On 3/4/09 10:33 AM, "Margaret Wasserman" <mrw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Then the template has to be changed. Will the IETF still continue to
accept documents formatted the old way or will it mandate this change
everywhere - and gee - that could be our own little stimulus package -
we may have to hire someone to move the (c) in all of the existing
documents to the end pages with the licensing info.
Todd
I would like to propose that we re-format Internet-Drafts such that
the boilerplate (status and copyright) is moved to the back of the
draft, and the abstract moves up to page 1.
I don't believe that there are any legal implications to moving our
IPR information to the back of the document, and it would be great not
to have to page down at the beginning of every I-D to skip over it.
If someone wants to check the licensing details, they could look at
the end of the document.
Margaret
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf