Re: RFC 3484 section 6 rule 9 causing more operational problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[It seems to me that this discussion needs to happen in dnsext, so
I've added a Reply-To header to that effect.]

On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 02:09:22PM +0000, Tony Finch wrote:
> 
> RFC 3484 needs to be updated to delete this rule

May I assume that we'll see your I-D specifying the change as soon as
possible, then?  (I appreciate that it's a little late for a -00, but
maybe after the queue re-opens?)

Best regards,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Shinkuro, Inc.
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]