On 2 mar 2009, at 04.12, John C Klensin wrote:
I am not suggesting trying to undo this decision, but believe that, as ISOC adds sufficient technically-qualified staff to engage in activities like this on its own, we need to work, collectively, on better ways to facilitate communication in a timely basis in the future. In particular, we need to work fairly hard to avoid a situation in which the IETF and ISOC end up with different positions on an issue with external visibility and consequences. To do so would damage the credibility of all concerned.
This I completely agree with, we have to avoid such situations.But we have to also to work hard on not to create a chicken out of a feather. Instead learn and do things even better next time.
Regarding Liberty Alliance, I think we should let Lucy coordinate some more information for the IETF that can be presented in due time. As she said, she will (as well as I) be in San Francisco and we are all happy to talk.
Patrik
Attachment:
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf