Hi - > From: "Bill Manning" <bmanning@xxxxxxx> > To: "Lawrence Rosen" <lrosen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "'IETF Discussion'" <ietf@xxxxxxxx> > Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 2:42 PM > Subject: Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your reviewandcomments on a proposed Work-Around to the Pre-5378 Problem ... > er... thats -NOT- what I was trying to point out. The IETF > was given permission to publish an authors work but was not > allowed to impune joint authorship. The IETF did not create the > work - it provided a publication vehicle. ... That certainly was *not* my understanding when I offered my services as an editor for the various IDs and RFCs where I've functioned in that role. I, and I'm sure many others in those working groups, thought those documents were products of the working group, which did that work for the IETF. For me to claim authorship of, e.g., RFC 3417, would be intellectually dishonest. For the IETF to claim that I was its author, rather than merely an editor acting on the instruction of a working group, is downright delusional. Randy _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf