>>>>> "John" == John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> writes:
>> We have a reality that the new IPR rules are fundamentally
>> problematic. Prior to their imposition, we had a functioning
>> system. Now we don't.
>>
>> And the only thing that changed was imposition of the new
>> rules. Nothing else happened.
>>
>> The proposals are mostly about adding another layer of 'fix' to
>> what was supposed, itself, to be an incremental fix. The odds
>> that we will get that additional layer wrong are demonstrably
>> high.
John> And that is precisely why my I-D turns things into a choice
John> between new rules and old rules, based only on the
John> conclusion of the submitter about what is important... and
John> why it does not attempt to "fix" 5378. I agree with you
John> about the odds of getting an additional layer right,
John> especially so if we try to do it quickly.
For what it is worth, I as an individual support the new rules, and believe Russ gave me a fine answer.
I would not support turning this into a choice.
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf