Re: IPR Questions Raised by Sam Hartman at the IETF 73 Plenary

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2008-12-13 08:20, Russ Housley wrote:
> At 01:28 PM 12/12/2008, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> 
>> As far as I understand, I can no longer take RFC 4398, fix some
>> minor problem, and re-submit it as a RFC 4398bis.  Even though I was
>> editor of RFC 4398.  The reason is that some material in that document
>> was written by others.  At least, I cannot do this, without getting
>> permission from the other people who wrote the initial document.  I wish
>> this is mistaken and that someone can explain how to reconcile this
>> example with what Russ wrote.
> 
> Correct.  RFC 5378 imposes this burden on the contributor.  All of the
> rights needed to make updates to the document within the IETF Standards
> Process are clearly already available, but the contributor is required
> to obtain the additional rights that are required by RFC 5378.

Formally yes. But the Trust can take the sting out of this by
a vigorous effort to get former contributors to sign over the
necessary rights, and by providing a convenient method for
this to be done.

     Brian
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]