michael.dillon@xxxxxx schrieb: > an informational RFC. A DNSBL sits in the middle of an > end-to-end email transaction, and there is a danger of this A fine, but important distinction: DNSxLs do not sit in the middle. They provide data to the receiving mail system about the sending mail system, which is then pretty much free to decide what to do with this data. > If reputation systems are going to be an integral part > of the future Internet email service, then this existing "going to be"? They already are. Since about 10 or so years. -- Matthias _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf