> The AS count might also be of interest - 15% of the > non-stub IPv4 addresses (AS's that offer transit to > other ASes) also originate IPv6 prefixes. How did this 15% change over the past 4 years and/or past 18 months? What percentage would that be of the total AS count? Thanks, Peter --- On Wed, 11/12/08, Geoff Huston <gih@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Geoff Huston <gih@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: IPv6 traffic stats > To: "Harald Alvestrand" <harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: tytso@xxxxxxx, "Pekka Savola" <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx>, ietf@xxxxxxxx > Date: Wednesday, November 12, 2008, 2:08 PM > I've been looking at this as well and reported on the > relative amount of IPv6 traffic over the past 4 years at the > most recent NANOG > (http://www.potaroo.net/presentations/2008-10-13-ipv6-deployment.pdf) > > in recent times I am also seeing 0.5% of hosts preferring > to use IPv6 to access a dual-stacked site - the good news it > that this number has risen sharply in the past 18 months. > The not-so-good news it thats its still a bloody small > number! > > The AS count might also be of interest - 15% of the > non-stub IPv4 addresses (AS's that offer transit to > other ASes) also originate IPv6 prefixes. > > > Geoff > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf