This document is 36 pages long, yet devotes only a single paragraph to the use of extended RADIUS attributes. Since the extended attribute set is likely the one to be most used in the future, this seems a rather gross oversight. I would suggest that the authors try to design a few extended attribute sets and then document that experience. I mention this at this late date because I expected this note to become an RFC long before the extended attributes doc, but (FWIW) the latter has completed WG "Last" Call... _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf