RE: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Title: Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long)
Well, we have a critical dependency on a star that is going to run out of hydrogen at some point...
 


From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx on behalf of Dave CROCKER
Sent: Tue 11/11/2008 10:42 AM
To: michael.dillon@xxxxxx
Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: IP-based reputation services vs. DNSBL (long)



michael.dillon@xxxxxx wrote:
> DNSBLs are a temporary band-aid solution for a badly broken
> Internet email architecture.


DNS-based reputation lists have been in production use for at least 11 years?
There is no industry move to reduce their use.

By what metric does this qualify as "temporary"?

d/

--

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]