On Mon, 10 Nov 2008, Keith Moore wrote: > Tony Finch wrote: > > > In any case, DNSBLs should scale roughly according to the size of the > > routing table, not the size of the address space. > > What does it mean for a DNSBL to "scale"? I was referring to the number of entries that have to be maintained. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <dot@xxxxxxxx> http://dotat.at/ MALIN HEBRIDES: CYCLONIC BECOMING NORTHWEST 7 TO SEVERE GALE 9. VERY ROUGH OR HIGH. SQUALLY SHOWERS. MODERATE OR POOR. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf