--On Wednesday, 24 September, 2008 09:57 +0200 Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > John C Klensin skrev: > >> But apparently the >> IESG does not agree -- I hope not because, for some >> incomprehensible-to-me reason, they prefer the obscurity. >> > > The IESG is currently spending a substantial amount of time > discussing this issue. I hope the community will see some of > the fruits of this discussion in the near future. I look forward to it and won't expect more comments until the IESG is ready. But I hope that the issue the IESG is discussing is focused on the granularity and appropriateness of these types of rules because, from my point of view, "how much time does it take to get it right and how else could that time be spent" are the key questions, not the issue about what names/identifiers should be used in examples.. especially in normal, new document, cases. john _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf