> At the moment, the condition is "no single Unicode code point." To > the extent that a single CJK ideograph can be expressed using a > single Unicode code point, this would represent the situation to > which you say you would object. I will dig through my notes to find > out why the "single character" condition was adopted - Would you be able to explain why the condition is "no single Unicode code point"? Whats the technical basis for that? -James Seng _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf