The particular document at issue is "Default Address Selection for IP version 6". If you want to raise a similar issue for IPv4, I'm sure that there is an appropriate WG list for that as well. At 12:39 PM 6/3/2008, Tony Finch wrote: >On Tue, 3 Jun 2008, Michael StJohns wrote: > >> Can I suggest this discussion be transferred off the main list and to >> either the 6man list or the v6opts list (or both) please? > >It causes operational problems for IPv4 too. > >Tony. >-- >f.anthony.n.finch <dot@xxxxxxxx> http://dotat.at/ >WIGHT PORTLAND: NORTHWEST BACKING SOUTHWEST 4 OR 5, OCCASIONALLY 6 AT FIRST. >SLIGHT OR MODERATE. SHOWERS. MODERATE OR GOOD. >_______________________________________________ >IETF mailing list >IETF@xxxxxxxx >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf