Looking at the LTANS charter, I would offer the work is already well underway. Thanks for pointing that out. I would agree, no need for a new work group, and especially no need for a new directorate. Sigh - I'm just a poor APPS and RAI guy (hey - that rhymes :-) On Jun 2, 2008, at 7:46 AM, Peter Sylvester wrote: > What is missing that would require a new AREA. > The security area is not appropriate? > If 'area' actually meant working group, > I wonder to what degrre the problem of 'digital evidence' > is already treated in the LTANS working group. > > > Eric Burger wrote: >> The idea that time services are important and of interest sounds >> reasonable to me. Given there has been no discussion on the list, >> I would offer you write an informational draft referencing the >> various protocols that could benefit from such consolidation. >> That may generate interest, or, upon fully understanding the >> concept, may generate enough explanation of why it is not a good >> idea. Either way, I would like to see some discussion, post the >> availability of a thought-out roadmap. >> >> On May 17, 2008, at 1:26 PM, TS Glassey wrote: >> >> >>> Now that there are multiple time services WG's its becoming very >>> clear that >>> the driving processes for product IP transit systems which move >>> time is now >>> central to the IETF's operations. >>> >>> It if for that reason that I am suggesting that all of the Time >>> Centric >>> Protocols be lumped together into a new Area specifically focused >>> on Digital >>> Evidence (DE). >>> >>> The reasons are simple, the DE scope of operations is rapidly >>> becoming key >>> to many existing and emerging network use models, and its one >>> which needs to >>> be managed in cooperation with other WG's and Organizations to >>> insure proper >>> adoption of IETF workproducts. >>> >>> Todd Glassey >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> IETF mailing list >>> IETF@xxxxxxxx >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> IETF mailing list >> IETF@xxxxxxxx >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf >> >> > > > -- > To verify the signature, see http://edelpki.edelweb.fr/ Cela vous > permet de charger le certificat de l'autorité; die Liste mit > zurückgerufenen Zertifikaten finden Sie da auch. > _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf