Black_David@xxxxxxx wrote: >I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) >reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see >http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). > >Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments >you may receive. > >Document: draft-ietf-lemonade-convert-17.txt >Reviewer: David L. Black >Review Date: 15 April 2008 >IETF LC End Date: 16 April 2008 > > Hi David, Thank you for your review. >Summary: >This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that >should be fixed before publication. > >Comments: >This is a generally well-written draft on the CONVERT extension >to IMAP. All of these comments are minor nits. > >In Section 2, please remove this convention: > [[anchor3: Editorial comments and questions are marked like this.]] > Done. >p.10 contains a couple of example email addresses. Please use >example.com, example.net or example.org as the domain. > Somebody else complained about this earlier, so I've already fixed this in my copy. >In Section 11.1 are the To: and Subject: lines needed as part of >the IANA registration? If not, please remove them. > > They are a part of the IANA template in RFC 2506, so I would rather keep them >In the IANA registration in Section 11.1, please ask IANA to >replace RFC XXXX by the RFC number assigned to this draft. > > Ok. >idnits 2.08.05 got confused by the square brackets used in IMAP >syntax and reported a number of potential reference problems - >there are no actual problems. > > Indeed. _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf