Eliot Lear wrote:
> Russ,
>
>
>> When IETF lists are housed somewhere other than ietf.org, they are
>> supposed to include an archive recipient so that there is an archive
>> available at ietf.org (perhaps in addition to the one kept at the
>> place where the list is housed).
>>
>>
>
> I'll agree with Phill's conclusion on this one.
>
> I think there is probably convenience value to housing the mailing lists
> at the IETF. It allows for a single whitelist, reduction in those
> annoying monthly messages that we eventually all filter into the
> bitbucket. Also, it probably is easier to effect and audit policy
> (such as we have any) in terms of message retention, uniform access, etc.
>
The other things is when we start DKIM signing (HINT HINT), it will
give a single identity for reputation, etc to latch onto.
Mike
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf