RE: Proposed Revisions to IETF Trust Administrative Procedures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




--On Wednesday, 09 April, 2008 13:50 -0400 Ed Juskevicius
<edj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> John, you wrote:
> 
>> Then recommend to the community that the Trust Agreement be
>> changed.
> 
> The Trustees are not talking about changing the terms of the
> Trust Agreement, so this should not be necessary.

Good.  But I was just trying to suggest, following what I
thought I saw in Marshall's note, that, if the Trust Agreement
is defective, one could try to change it.  The other option is
to conform to it.  Ignoring it and adopting procedures or
polices inconsistent with it --even if one believes those
policies will never be triggered-- is a non-starter.
 
>> I am worried about the IAOC and/or Trustees adopting
>> procedures that are inconsistent with the Trust Agreement.
> 
> Me too! It is not the intention of the Trustees to adopt
> procedures that are inconsistent with the Trust Agreement.  
>  
>> if anything is going to be said, it needs to be consistent
>> with the Trust Agreement _and_ reflect the desires and intent
>> of the community.
> 
> I agree.

I think we are in synch.

    john

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]