Olaf Kolkman skrev:
>
>
> While reviewing the documents I tried to determine how the 4 streams
> currently defined in RFC4844 fit into the framework.
>
> Although the stream is not specifically mentioned it is clear that the
> incoming rights document applies to the IETF Stream.
That was my interpretation too. I (wearing my WG chair hat) take under
advisement that this needs to be made clear, possibly with a 4844 reference.
In the terms of pre-4844 terminology, I (wearing my contributor hat)
always thought of IRTF and IAB streams as subsets of the "non-IETF" stream.
>
> To me it is clear that a contribution to the IAB is explicitly bound
> by the rules (including the No Duty to Publish rule, that allows for
> confidential information to be supplied to the IAB), so are
> contributions from the IAB, i.e. IAB stream document. I conclude this
> from the fact that "IAB" is part of the IETF under the definition in
> 1.e. However, I may be over-interpreting, and the status of the
> incoming rights for the IAB stream is also not captured.
I think the IAB will have to make the rules for the IAB stream; a rule
that says "-incoming and -outgoing applies as appropriate" would be nice
and short - but it's not within the scope of an IETF WG to make that
determination.
Harald
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf