Ned Freed wrote: >> Indeed, if you asked >> a random sampling of those groups --remembering that there are a >> huge number of SMTP servers in the world, only a tiny fraction >> of which are professional operations and with an even smaller >> fraction being large-scale, carefully-managed production ones, >> you might discover that many of them had forgotten that there >> was such a thing as an MX record and how to set it up. > > And even if they know MX records exist they may not be able to use them. Some > DNS provisioning arrangements allow users to set up MX records but there are > others that do not. This observation moves the proposed AAAA-only mode into one of high risk. Rather than the benefit of reducing complexity, it becomes the danger of threatening interoperability. Let's note that the proposal is a change from a model that has worked solidly for 20 years and has not been a source of problems. While the proposal is for a mode that is appealing, it is not necessary. Methinks it is therefore time to respectfully retire the proposal. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf